business-domain-context

Kind context with a declared write scope (agentic-qa-core/references/skill-composition-strategy.md §2b). Delivered once by upstream as a placeholder, then owned by the project: the map inside is this project's synthesis. Procedure: agentic-qa-core/references/business-context-maps.md.

Compact Rules

• DO: read the map through bun run context:map business-domain-context (or --section term-<slug> for one term). NEVER read references/business-domain-map.html raw.
• DO: treat a placeholder map as "no glossary". Say so and hand the user project-discovery Phase 1; never name test cases or rewrite ACs in invented vocabulary.
• DO: use the business term the map gives, and quote the UI label when a step talks about the screen. The code identifier belongs in code and selectors, never in a TC title or a bug summary.
• WHEN a session observes a term the map lacks, or a label or meaning that contradicts a section: PROPOSE the one-section edit with its evidence to the user (or to the conductor when you are a supervised worker), apply it only on approval. Procedure: references/refresh.md.
• DO NOT: write anywhere but this skill's own references/. No Jira, no .context/, no other skill, no test code, no product code.
• DO NOT: copy map content into this SKILL.md. Judgment goes in ## Rules or references/gotchas.md, dated and measured.
• Figures are optional here: the glossary is tables. Before a step that draws one, run the point-of-use check in agentic-qa-core/references/preflight-gate.md §8.

Read full SKILL.md when: building a briefing for an ATP, TC naming or AC refinement dispatch, deciding whether a term is stale, or proposing an edit to the map.

What this skill knows

One aspect of the system under test: its business and its words. What problem the product solves, for whom, how it earns, and what each domain term means to the people who use it. Loading it changes what the agent KNOWS; the only thing it ever does is propose an edit to its own map.