Pull Request Review Follow-Up

Re-evaluate the original concern against the current head and full conversation. An author reply, emoji, or changed line is not proof that the concern is fixed. Keep reviewer-side follow-up read-only with respect to the author's code and history: do not edit, commit, push, or rewrite the PR branch.

Decisions

• Resolved: the current implementation and verification address the concern.
• Needs follow-up: evidence is incomplete, the fix is partial, or a new risk was introduced.
• No longer applicable: the code or scope changed and the original concern is obsolete.
• Needs user judgment: product or architectural intent remains ambiguous.