adversarial-peer-review
Adversarial Peer Review
Review as a serious top-venue reviewer: skeptical, specific, evidence-based, and fair. The goal is to find the objections that would block acceptance before external reviewers do.
Read First
references/peer-review-policy.mdreferences/claim-audit.mdreferences/cs-methodology-evaluation-policy.md
Workflow
More from vincenzoimp/academic-research-skills
source-ingestion
Use when adding, reading, registering, or organizing research sources such as PDFs, arXiv papers, Zotero items, proposals, datasets, reports, archives, web pages, BibTeX, or source metadata.
14skill-evaluation
Use when testing, reviewing, pressure-testing, refining, packaging, or validating agent skills for academic research workflows before installing or relying on them.
13repo-migration
Use when migrating messy academic research repositories, downloaded archives, proposal folders, ad hoc notebooks, scripts, datasets, or paper assets into the standard research project structure.
13ethics-data-governance
Use when academic research involves human subjects, public web data, platform scraping, illicit markets, sensitive content, privacy risk, dataset sharing, consent, IRB, licenses, or data retention.
13research-project-router
Use when an academic research repository task could involve research design, sources, conversion, bibliography, SOTA, reviews, ethics, experiments, papers, reproduction, MCP tools, or project maintenance and the correct workflow is not obvious.
13citation-claim-audit
Use when verifying citations, bibliography, manuscript claims, source support, factual accuracy, numerical results, citation drift, or evidence provenance in academic work.
13