Brainstorm

Divergence only: many one-line ideas from perspectives that cannot hear each other. The deliverable is the pool of options — what to do or build. Picking, planning, and feasibility belong to the conversation after, not to this skill.

Independent generation is the point of the machinery: ideas produced in one shared context drift toward whatever came first (anchoring), so each perspective runs blind in its own subagent — the nominal-group structure that outperforms people (and models) riffing in one room.

1. Pin the topic

Take the argument as the topic. Without one, use what the conversation is about. Only when both are empty, ask the user one question: what are we generating ideas for?

The argument may carry free-text overrides alongside the topic — a count ("10 ideas", "50 ideas") resizes the batch; "surprise me" makes the whole roster wildcards. Honor them; otherwise defaults below apply.

2. Cast six perspectives

Derive four from the topic: stakeholders it touches, adjacent fields, its opposite or its victim — people who would each want a different thing from it. Sample two wildcards from: a seven-year-old, a supervillain, a sci-fi author, a person from 1900, a street-food vendor, a game designer, a broke artist, an alien anthropologist.

Name each perspective concretely ("night-shift nurse", not "healthcare stakeholder") — vague personas produce interchangeable ideas.

3. Dispatch all six blind, in one response