Idea critic

Criticize through the routes the user selected. Opus and GPT are independent perspectives with different error profiles; neither route is a fallback or a quality tier.

Select mode

For /x9-idea-critic [mode] [idea], treat the first argument as a mode only when it is one of the recognized words below. Otherwise it is part of the idea. Natural-language requests map to the same modes.

Mode	Natural-language examples	Critics
default / omitted	«раскритикуй идею», «проверь на прочность»	one fresh Opus critic and one fresh GPT critic
`opus`	«раскритикуй опусом»	one fresh Opus critic
`gpt`	«спроси GPT», «раскритикуй через GPT»	one fresh GPT critic through Codex
`full`	«разнеси по полной», «панель критиков»	2–3 critics from each provider with distinct lenses

For full, use feasibility/execution, user or market demand, and devil's-advocate/simpler-alternative lenses as applicable. Tell the user that this mode is slower and heavier, then start as much parallel work as the host capacity permits.

x9-idea-critic

Idea critic

Select mode

Sealed brief