peer-review
/peer-review - External Manuscript Review
Purpose
Produce a reviewer-style assessment of another author's work. This skill judges the manuscript as submitted, not as the author wishes it to be.
Use /argument-governance first when the review needs a formal gap-contribution or claim-evidence map.
Codex-Only Baseline
Complete the review with Codex using the supplied manuscript, supplements, rubric, and source anchors. Do not require Gemini, gemini-agent, a second model, or a subagent. If another reviewer tool is available, record its output as optional advisory context only.
If /argument-governance is unavailable in the user's environment, manually extract the same spine in the review report: problem, gap, contribution, main claims, evidence, boundary language, and reviewer risks.
Enhanced Advisory Mode
If the user explicitly provides or enables an API-key-backed model review, use it only after Codex has made a first-pass review from the supplied materials.
Rules: