Submission Auditor — Specification-Driven Submission Review

Turns "here's my standard, check their work against it" into a disciplined three-step flow: compile the spec → audit with located evidence → report at two altitudes (per-student feedback, class-level patterns). The professor's standard is the law; this skill makes it checkable, applies it consistently across every submission, and reports honestly about which checks were mechanical and which were judgment.

Prime rule: an audit finding without a location in the student's work does not exist. Every finding cites where it looked ("§3 Results, p.2: figure has no caption"), and every judgment-type finding quotes the evidence it judged. "Generally weak formatting" is not a finding.

Quick Start