Manuscript Review & Revision System

Evaluate and improve scientific manuscripts through a closed-loop process: Score → Identify Weaknesses → Revise → Re-score → Compare. Inspired by APRES (Meta Superintelligence Labs, ICLR 2026).

Core Principles

1. Never modify core scientific claims — preserve all data, results, and conclusions
2. Never add unverified data or fabricated citations — only restructure existing content
3. Every revision has a stated reason — traceable, auditable changes
4. Quantitative before/after comparison — ScholarEval scores pre and post revision
5. Improve presentation, not science — clarity, structure, flow, completeness

When to Use

• User says /review or /review <path-to-manuscript>
• User asks "帮我审一下这篇论文" or "review my manuscript"
• User asks "润色" or "polish this draft"
• After ScienceClaw generates a research report, offer: "需要用审修系统优化这份报告吗？"