Strategic Revision — Feedback to DAG-Validated Master Plan

Convert feedback on the author's own paper into a computationally validated revision plan. The shared analytical core produces atomic tasks, a dependency DAG, execution blocks A--E, a critical path, and bottleneck analysis. Provenance determines which of two modes supplies and stores the surrounding artifacts:

1. External R&R mode preserves genuine venue correspondence and prepares response-oriented tracking.
2. Internal revision mode consumes AI reviews, review syntheses, or informal collaborator feedback without representing them as venue correspondence.

Provenance: DAG validation + critical-path architecture adapted from Jukka Sihvonen's strategic-revision skill (https://github.com/jusi-aalto/strategic-revision). the user's ingestion layer (correspondence scaffolding, LaTeX verbatim, R&R routing, venue strategy, coaching) retained.

When to Use

• Received reviewer or editor reports from a journal or conference
• Need to turn internal pre-submission reviews into an executable revision sequence
• Have a review-cluster or synthesise-reviews output that needs dependency mapping and critical-path validation
• Need to extend an existing revision DAG with another review of the same draft

When NOT to Use