Review Bug Fixer

Fix valid code review findings from arbitrary review markdown files against the current branch.

Workflow

1. Collect review files — Read all review files the user provides (e.g., review1.md, review2.md, review3.md). Accept any number of files in any format (structured or free-form).

2. Build a unified issue list — Extract every distinct finding across all files. Deduplicate: if multiple files flag the same issue (same file + same concern), merge them into one entry. Preserve the strongest/clearest description.

3. Triage each finding — Classify every finding into one of:

   • Fix — Valid bug, logic error, security issue, or correctness problem. Apply the fix.
   • Skip — Ignore if any of these apply:
     • Nit or style-only (naming preferences, formatting, comment wording)
     • Not actually valid (misunderstanding of the code, already handled, false positive)
     • Overly defensive (adds complexity for scenarios that realistically won't occur — e.g., redundant null checks on values guaranteed by the framework, error handling for impossible states, excessive input validation on internal-only code paths)

   When in doubt, lean toward skipping. The goal is to fix real bugs, not gold-plate the code.