performing-security-code-review

Pass

Audited by Gen Agent Trust Hub on Jul 21, 2026

Risk Level: SAFECOMMAND_EXECUTIONREMOTE_CODE_EXECUTION
Full Analysis
  • [COMMAND_EXECUTION]: The file assets/example_code_vulnerable.py contains a demonstration function command_injection_example that uses subprocess.run(command, shell=True). This is explicitly presented as a vulnerable code pattern for educational purposes and is not part of the skill's operational scripts.
  • [REMOTE_CODE_EXECUTION]: The file assets/example_code_vulnerable.py includes an insecure_deserialization_example function using the pickle.loads() method. It also defines a MaliciousClass designed to execute rm -rf / via os.system upon deserialization. These components are documented as demonstration material for security training.
  • [INDIRECT_PROMPT_INJECTION]: The skill is designed to ingest and analyze external project code, creating a surface for indirect prompt injection if an attacker embeds malicious instructions within the source files being reviewed.
  • Ingestion points: Project source files identified in step 1 of the review process (SKILL.md).
  • Boundary markers: Absent; the report is generated as standard Markdown without specific isolation markers for code snippets.
  • Capability inventory: The skill uses Read, Write, Edit, Grep, Glob, and Bash tools to analyze files and generate reports.
  • Sanitization: No specific sanitization or escaping steps are defined for handling content extracted from the reviewed codebase before including it in the output report.
Audit Metadata
Risk Level
SAFE
Analyzed
Jul 21, 2026, 11:31 AM
Security Audit — agent-trust-hub — performing-security-code-review