performing-security-code-review
Pass
Audited by Gen Agent Trust Hub on Jul 21, 2026
Risk Level: SAFECOMMAND_EXECUTIONREMOTE_CODE_EXECUTION
Full Analysis
- [COMMAND_EXECUTION]: The file
assets/example_code_vulnerable.pycontains a demonstration functioncommand_injection_examplethat usessubprocess.run(command, shell=True). This is explicitly presented as a vulnerable code pattern for educational purposes and is not part of the skill's operational scripts. - [REMOTE_CODE_EXECUTION]: The file
assets/example_code_vulnerable.pyincludes aninsecure_deserialization_examplefunction using thepickle.loads()method. It also defines aMaliciousClassdesigned to executerm -rf /viaos.systemupon deserialization. These components are documented as demonstration material for security training. - [INDIRECT_PROMPT_INJECTION]: The skill is designed to ingest and analyze external project code, creating a surface for indirect prompt injection if an attacker embeds malicious instructions within the source files being reviewed.
- Ingestion points: Project source files identified in step 1 of the review process (
SKILL.md). - Boundary markers: Absent; the report is generated as standard Markdown without specific isolation markers for code snippets.
- Capability inventory: The skill uses
Read,Write,Edit,Grep,Glob, andBashtools to analyze files and generate reports. - Sanitization: No specific sanitization or escaping steps are defined for handling content extracted from the reviewed codebase before including it in the output report.
Audit Metadata