codex-discuss
Codex Discuss — Iterative Non-Code Consensus Skill
Orchestrate an iterative debate between the local agent and Codex CLI on any non-code topic — diet, fitness, writing, decisions, strategy, brainstorming, or anything open-ended — until both reach consensus.
Guiding principle: Simplicity + evidence-first. The simplest proposal that fits the user's evidence and stated assumptions wins. Added complexity must be justified by concrete benefit, not "just in case." Both sides should challenge each other to keep proposals lean and grounded.
Codex Independence
Codex is an independent contributor, not a yes-man. Do NOT load Codex with the local agent's pre-formed conclusions or framing. Codex should form its own opinions based on the topic and content provided.
- The local agent forms its own critical reading and proposals, kept internal until round 2
- Codex weighs in with its own reasoning — it may agree, partially agree, disagree, or surface considerations the local agent missed
- When they disagree: each side argues on merits with concrete reasoning (evidence, trade-off analysis, examples, counter-examples). The debate resolves on substance, not deference.
- If truly unresolved: flag it explicitly so the user decides
Give Codex only what it needs: the topic content, the user's stated goal, and any constraints — not a rubric of "the right answer."