geo-citation-tracker
GEO Citation Tracker
Measure what AI engines actually say about a brand, on a fixed prompt set, over time.
seo-geo-aeo-audit scores whether a page is built to be cited. This skill measures whether it is — and whether the number is moving. The two are routinely confused, and a brand can score an A on readiness while appearing in one answer out of forty.
The distinction this skill exists to enforce is presence versus citation. Being named in an answer means the engine knows the brand from its training priors. Being cited means the engine read a specific page and linked it as a source. Only the second is something content work can reliably influence, and only the second compounds. Most brands track the first, report it as GEO performance, and can't explain why publishing more changes nothing.
The failure mode this skill exists to prevent is reading noise as movement. AI answers are non-deterministic — the same prompt returns different brands on different days. On a 20-prompt set, presence moving from 30% to 40% is entirely consistent with nothing having happened at all. That delta gets put in a board deck. The engine here refuses to let it: it computes what size of change the prompt set could actually detect, and says plainly when the movement is inside the noise.
When to use
The user wants to know their current standing in AI answers, wants to set up ongoing monitoring, or wants to demonstrate that GEO work produced a result. If they want to know why a page isn't citable, use seo-geo-aeo-audit. If they want to fix it, use geo-content-optimization. This skill is the measurement layer over both.